2 models · 38,463 observations · under measurement since 2 May
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kyma serves all of these, so the availability, throughput and latency below are its own readings rather than anybody's marketing. What each creator publishes about its own model is further down, kept separate, and clearly theirs.
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
36,997 obs
since 2 May
263 from Kyma's own probe
Qwen 3.7 FlashAlibaba
1,466 obs
since 29 Jul
6 from Kyma's own probe
Availability, and how much of it we can actually see
Successful observations divided by total observations over the last 30 days, counting Kyma's own probe and real customer requests the same way. Same method and same figures as /models.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is ahead at 100.0%, by more than the thinnest sample here could produce by chance on 36,997 observations.
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3.7 FlashThe tinted band is the measurement's own grain. It is 0.2 points wide, which is what three failed requests are worth in the thinnest sample on this page. One or two is what luck looks like, so a lead has to clear all three before this page will call it. Scale starts at 95%, not at zero, and dot size is the size of the sample behind the figure.
Throughput
Median tokens per second, from one identical prompt sent to every model every six hours, so the only variable left between two rows is the model.
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3.7 FlashLatency
Median time to a complete response on that same fixed prompt. It moves with output length, so it is a reading on one prompt rather than a promise about yours.
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen 3.7 FlashWhat a request costs today, per 1M tokens. A model on offer shows the rate you are actually charged and the date it returns to list.
| Fact | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Input per 1M tokens | $0.1264 | $0.0504 |
Output per 1M tokens | $0.2526 | $0.2187 |
Cached input repeated prefixes | $0.0243 | $0.0081 |
The specification each creator publishes for its own model, read straight from the catalogue Kyma serves from. Nothing in this block is a Kyma opinion.
| Fact | DeepSeek V4 Flash | Qwen 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
Context window tokens in one request | 1M | 1M |
Max output ceiling on one response | 66K | 8K |
Accepts | Text | Text, image, video |
Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
Vision input | No | Yes |
Weights | Opendeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash | not established |
Below release precision narrower than the creator shipped | None reported | Not established |
What this instrument does not measure
This page carries no benchmark scores, so it will not tell you which model is smarter. It tells you which is cheaper, which is faster, which stays up, and what each one accepts. For the quality question, run both on your own prompts: one key, one line changed, and the answer is about your work rather than someone else's test set.